Churchill v. Baumann
38 P. 43, 104 Cal. 369, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 919
Opinions
Upon a reconsideration of the questions involved in this appeal we are satisfied with the conclusion reached by Department One in its opinion filed herein March 10, 1894, and for the reasons stated in that opinion the order appealed from must be affirmed.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Churchill v. Baumann, 38 P. 43, 104 Cal. 369, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 919 (Cal. 1894).
38 P. 43 (Churchill v. Baumann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Union Oil Co. v. Reconstruction Oil Co.
66 P.2d 1215 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
Farrell v. City of Ontario
178 P. 740 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Fischer v. Trustees of Clifton Springs
121 N.Y.S. 163 (New York Supreme Court, 1909)
Churchill v. Louie
67 P. 1062 (California Supreme Court, 1902)