Churchill v. Baumann
38 P. 43, 104 Cal. 369, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 919
This text of 38 P. 43 (Churchill v. Baumann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Churchill v. Baumann, 38 P. 43, 104 Cal. 369, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 919 (Cal. 1894).
Opinions
Upon a reconsideration of the questions involved in this appeal we are satisfied with the conclusion reached by Department One in its opinion filed herein March 10, 1894, and for the reasons stated in that opinion the order appealed from must be affirmed.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Union Oil Co. v. Reconstruction Oil Co.
66 P.2d 1215 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
Farrell v. City of Ontario
178 P. 740 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Fischer v. Trustees of Clifton Springs
121 N.Y.S. 163 (New York Supreme Court, 1909)
Churchill v. Louie
67 P. 1062 (California Supreme Court, 1902)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
38 P. 43, 104 Cal. 369, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/churchill-v-baumann-cal-1894.