Church v. State

157 So. 3d 1053, 2014 WL 1303205, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4784
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Church v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 So. 3d 1252
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 2, 2014·No. No. 2D13-1184·Published

Opinion

VILLANTI, Judge.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Brandon James Church’s judgment and sentence but remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error in the order revoking probation. At the violation of probation hearing, Church admitted to and was sentenced based upon only one condition five violation, a second-degree misdemeanor. However, because the violation order contains a scrivener’s error reflecting two condition five violations, we must remand the matter back to the trial court to enter a corrected violation order. See Hamilton v. State, 128 So.3d 177,177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Affirmed and remanded.

LaROSE and SLEET, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Church v. State, 157 So. 3d 1053, 2014 WL 1303205, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4784 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

157 So. 3d 1053 (Church v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Hamilton v. State
128 So. 3d 177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)