Church v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Church v. State

360 So. 2d 801, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16271

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 12, 1978·No. No. 77-2027·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, the present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time [802]*802served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975) requires. Knight v. State, 349 So.2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Therefore, we remand the case for correction of sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, the present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time [802]*802served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975) requires. Knight v. State, 349 So.2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Therefore, we remand the case for correction of sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Church v. State, 360 So. 2d 801, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16271 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

360 So. 2d 801 (Church v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related