Church v. St. Paul Title Insurance & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Church v. St. Paul Title Insurance & Trust Co.

59 N.W. 1103, 58 Minn. 472, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 436

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided August 16, 1894·No. No. 8799·Published

Opinion

Collins, J.

The appellant’s contention here is that the District Court, having jurisdiction of the proceedings in insolvency, is the only tribunal in which the controversy between those parties can be litigated and determined. The statute (Laws 1893, ch. 54) would seem to be broad enough to confer upon any court in the state, having jurisdiction of the amount involved, authority to try and determine cases of this character. But, in any event, the question was really-disposed of in Irwin v. McKechnie, ante, p. 145, (59 N. W. 987.)

Judgment affirmed.

Buck, J., absent; did not sit.

(Opinion published 59 N. W. 1103.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins, J.

The appellant’s contention here is that the District Court, having jurisdiction of the proceedings in insolvency, is the only tribunal in which the controversy between those parties can be litigated and determined. The statute (Laws 1893, ch. 54) would seem to be broad enough to confer upon any court in the state, having jurisdiction of the amount involved, authority to try and determine cases of this character. But, in any event, the question was really-disposed of in Irwin v. McKechnie, ante, p. 145, (59 N. W. 987.)

Judgment affirmed.

Buck, J., absent; did not sit.

(Opinion published 59 N. W. 1103.)

Church v. St. Paul Title Insurance & Trust Co., 59 N.W. 1103, 58 Minn. 472, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 436 (Mich. 1894).

Pincite

59 N.W. 1103 (Church v. St. Paul Title Insurance & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related