Church v. Sparrow

5 Wend. 223
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 1830·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Marcy, J.

Where a general partnership exists, and money is borrowed by one of the firm in the name of the firm, all the partners are liable, although the money when obtained be appropriated by the partner borrowing it to his own use. So, also, they are liable where one of the firm borrows money, (not expressly on his individual credit,) and it is shewn that it was borrowed for and appropriated to the use of the firm. Whether the money in this case was so borrowed and appropriated is a question which ought to be submitted to a jury, and we therefore order a new trial, although, from the case made, it would seem that the questions of fact as well as law were intended to have been submitted to our decision.

New trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Church v. Sparrow, 5 Wend. 223 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

5 Wend. 223 (Church v. Sparrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. Erckens
53 A.D. 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Kantrowitz v. Levin
35 N.Y.S. 1072 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)
Schwanck v. Davis
25 Neb. 196 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1888)
Toland v. Lutz
2 Ohio C.C. 453 (Ohio Circuit Courts, 1887)
Toland v. Lutz
1 Ohio Cir. Dec. 584 (Franklin Circuit Court, 1887)
Warren v. French
88 Mass. 317 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1863)
Stockwell v. Dillingham
50 Me. 442 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1862)
Best v. Starks
24 How. Pr. 58 (New York Supreme Court, 1859)
Porter v. Lobach
2 Bosw. 188 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1857)
Buckner v. Lee
8 Ga. 285 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1850)
Onondaga County Bank v. De Puy
17 Wend. 47 (New York Supreme Court, 1837)