Church v. Clason & Stanley

New York Supreme Court

Church v. Clason & Stanley

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 68, 1 Cole. Cas. 62

DecidedJanuary 15, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 68 (Church v. Clason & Stanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Church v. Clason & Stanley, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 68, 1 Cole. Cas. 62 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The English consolidation rule is the. one the court mean to insist on, and they will not permit the plaintiffs to prescribe to them any other.

Let the defendant take the effect of his motion.

The plaintiffs then applied for a rule to examine witnesses, de bene esse, in the one cause which stood open for trial $ but the court refused it, observing, that they were entitled to no indulgence, till they had first acceded to the terms already required.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The English consolidation rule is the. one the court mean to insist on, and they will not permit the plaintiffs to prescribe to them any other.

Let the defendant take the effect of his motion.

The plaintiffs then applied for a rule to examine witnesses, de bene esse, in the one cause which stood open for trial $ but the court refused it, observing, that they were entitled to no indulgence, till they had first acceded to the terms already required.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 68, 1 Cole. Cas. 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/church-v-clason-stanley-nysupct-1799.