Church v. Clark

38 Mass. 310
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 26, 1838
StatusPublished

This text of 38 Mass. 310 (Church v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Church v. Clark, 38 Mass. 310 (Mass. 1838).

Opinion

Shaw C. J.

afterward delivered the opinion of the Court. In general it is considered, that a note is payable at any time on demand on the last day of grace, or day it becomes due. But where the parties have, by the terms of their contract, fixed an hour, before which it shall not be deemed payable, that agreement will govern. By making a note payable at a bank, the effect of the contract is, that the note shall be paid at some lime during the usual bank hours at such bank ; and there is no default, on which an action can be commenbed, until the close of such bank hours. If no particular bank is named, the hour will be determined by the usual banking hours at the bank or several banks, in the place where the note is payable. As no bank is open for the ordinary transaction of business immediately after twelve o’clock at night, and as the maker is not m default till the close of the usual bank hours, there was no cause of action when this attachment was made ; and therefore the action cannot be sustained. This case differs essentially from that of Whitwell v. Brigham, decided in Suffolk in 1837.

Plaintiff nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Mass. 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/church-v-clark-mass-1838.