Church v. Attorney General VA
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7122
WILLIAM LEBRON CHURCH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; EDWARD W. MURRAY, Director; VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD; COUNTY OF AMELIA, VIRGINIA; THOMAS V. WARREN, Judge; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-612)
Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: November 16, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lebron Church, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assis- tant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
William Lebron Church appeals the magistrate judge’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) com-
plaint and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.* We have reviewed the
record and the magistrate judge’s opinions and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate
judge. Church v. Attorney Gen., No. CA-95-612 (E.D. Va. Apr. 14 &
May 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* This case was decided by a magistrate judge exercising jurisdiction upon consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)(1) (West 1993 & Supp. 1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Church v. Attorney General VA (Church v. Attorney General VA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.