Church v. Adams

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Church v. Adams

121 Mass. 257, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 343

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 1, 1876·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

When this action was commenced the plaintiff had a good cause of action against the defendant. The fact that it has since taken possession of the demanded premises does not abate the action, but it is entitled to judgment for costs and for rent and damages under the recognizance entered into by the defendant. Coburn v. Palmer, 8 Cush. 124. King v. Lawson, 98 Mass. 309. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

When this action was commenced the plaintiff had a good cause of action against the defendant. The fact that it has since taken possession of the demanded premises does not abate the action, but it is entitled to judgment for costs and for rent and damages under the recognizance entered into by the defendant. Coburn v. Palmer, 8 Cush. 124. King v. Lawson, 98 Mass. 309. Exceptions overruled.

Church v. Adams, 121 Mass. 257, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 343 (Mass. 1876).

Pincite

121 Mass. 257 (Church v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related