Church of the Good Shepherd v. Racine Water Co.
This text of 92 N.W. 436 (Church of the Good Shepherd v. Racine Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It so happens that Mr. Justice Dodge was of counsel in the subject-matter of the suit, and hence is barred from participating in the decision. The case is important, and has received the careful consideration of all the other members of the court. The result is that we find our[13]*13selves equally divided. Mr. Justice Winslow and Mr. Justice Bardeen think tlie order should be reversed. Mr. Justice Maesiiall and I think it should be affirmed. The same-conditions would work an affirmance had the trial court decided the other way. This being so, we have concluded not to give any reasons for the diverse views- entertained.
By the Oourt. — The order of the circuit court- is affirmed..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 N.W. 436, 116 Wis. 11, 1902 Wisc. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/church-of-the-good-shepherd-v-racine-water-co-wis-1902.