Church E. Gates & Co. v. National Fair & Exposition Ass'n

123 N.E. 892, 226 N.Y. 558, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 902
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Church E. Gates & Co. v. National Fair & Exposition Ass'n. Read the opinion of the Court — 225 N.Y. 142
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 4, 1919·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgments entered against the defendants, Yonkers Lumber Company and Laurence Brothers, Inc., for costs, are composed principally of printing disbursements that should equitably have been divided and taxed in part only against the defendants named. The remittitur so far as it directed costs against the defendants named, including an equitable part of the printing disbursements, was usual in view of the complete failure of the defendants named to succeed in sustaining their liens. While it is not generally" done, the court has in a few instances given specific direction in regard to the amount of printing disbursements to be taxed *559 against a particular party to an action. (Edison Electric Illum. Co. of Brooklyn v. Frick Co., 221 N. Y. 1.)

The motions in this case should be granted, without costs, and the remittitur amended by limiting the printing disbursements to be charged against the defendants, Yonkers Lumber Company and Laurence Brothers, Inc., to one-eighth part thereof against each.

All concur.

Motions

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Church E. Gates & Co. v. National Fair & Exposition Ass'n, 123 N.E. 892, 226 N.Y. 558, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 902 (N.Y. 1919).

123 N.E. 892 (Church E. Gates & Co. v. National Fair & Exposition Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Horace E. Frick Co.
116 N.E. 869 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)