Chupko v. Petitt & Reed
This text of 234 A.D. 711 (Chupko v. Petitt & Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order as resettled modified by striking out the names of Bryant L. Hopkins and C. M. Seeley as persons subject to exa-mb nation, upon the ground that neither is shown by the record to have been the operator or in control of the elevator in question, and that Seeley is in the employ of the defendant and is not “ without the state ” within the provisions of section 288 of the Civil Practice Act, and as so modified, affirmed without costs. Examination to proceed on five days’ notice at the hour and place stated in the order. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 A.D. 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chupko-v-petitt-reed-nyappdiv-1931.