Chunn v. State

161 So. 3d 415, 2014 WL 656650, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2513
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 2014
DocketNo. 5D13-3492
StatusPublished

This text of 161 So. 3d 415 (Chunn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chunn v. State, 161 So. 3d 415, 2014 WL 656650, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2513 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kyle Lee Chunn appeals from findings that he violated his probation in multiple ways (including serious new law violations), arguing that no condition one violation was proven or found, and that we should vacate the life sentence and remand for resentencing. The State properly concedes that the judgment needs to be corrected to reflect that the trial court did not find a condition one violation. No other relief is warranted, however, and we affirm in all other respects.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF JUDGMENT.

TORPY, C.J., SAWAYA and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 So. 3d 415, 2014 WL 656650, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chunn-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.