Chunn v. McMillan

929 So. 2d 597, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6461, 2006 WL 1140963
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 2006·No. No. 1D05-6028·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying the appellant’s ’motion to dismiss, abate, or transfer venue. The “Purchase & Sale Agreement,” which expressly governs the escrow transaction that is the subject of this litigation, contains a mandatory venue selection clause indicating that any litigation arising out of the agreement must be brought in Duval County, Florida. The trial court erred in not honoring this venue selection clause. Mgmt. Computer Controls, Inc. v. Charles Perry Constr., Inc., 743 So.2d 627, 631 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BARFIELD, DAVIS, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chunn v. McMillan, 929 So. 2d 597, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6461, 2006 WL 1140963 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

929 So. 2d 597 (Chunn v. McMillan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Management Computer v. Perry Const.
743 So. 2d 627 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)