Chunn v. . Jones
34 N.C. 251
This text of 34 N.C. 251 (Chunn v. . Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chunn v. . Jones, 34 N.C. 251 (N.C. 1851).
Opinion
The two motions of the plaintiff were entirely inconsistent. The appeal was dismissed at his instance for the want of jurisdiction, and the defendant acquiesced therein. It necessarily followed, that there could not be judgment for the debt, since that would imply jurisdiction and a decision on the merits.
Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 N.C. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chunn-v-jones-nc-1851.