Chunn v. . Jones
34 N.C. 251
Opinion
The two motions of the plaintiff were entirely inconsistent. The appeal was dismissed at his instance for the want of jurisdiction, and the defendant acquiesced therein. It necessarily followed, that there could not be judgment for the debt, since that would imply jurisdiction and a decision on the merits.
Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chunn v. . Jones, 34 N.C. 251 (N.C. 1851).
34 N.C. 251 (Chunn v. . Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.