Chung v. City and County of Honolulu, Department of Parks and Recreation

• Court: Hawaii Supreme Court
• Decided: February 3, 2015
• Docket: SCWC-11-0000763
• Status: Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000763 03-FEB-2015 01:53 PM

SCWC-11-0000763

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

NELSON A. CHUNG, Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant,

vs.

CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION, Respondent/Employer-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000763; CASE NO. AB 2008-558 (2-08-04079))

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-

referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court

of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was

filed, see Hawai#i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2013); see

also Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1)

(2012),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Claimant-

Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed

January 28, 2015, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the

application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2014) (“The application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of

the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or

dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is

extended in accordance with this rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 3, 2015.

R. Steven Geshell /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael W. Wilson