Chung, Jay Yoon
This text of Chung, Jay Yoon (Chung, Jay Yoon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-45,355-05
EX PARTE JAY YOON CHUNG, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. C34587 IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW FROM NAVARRO COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of
possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to imprisonment for ten years.
Applicant filed a motion to recuse the trial judge concurrently with his Article 11.07 habeas
corpus application. Ex parte Sinegar, 324 S.W.3d 578 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). The habeas record
has been properly forwarded to this Court by the district clerk. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07
§ 3(c). Because recusal proceedings were pending when the habeas corpus record was forwarded to
this Court, no judge has participated in the review of this writ application. We remand this application to the County Court at Law from Navarro County. Following the
recusal proceedings, the appropriate judge shall review the pleadings and determine whether there
are controverted, previously unresolved facts material to the legality of the Applicant’s confinement.
TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07 § 3(c). If so, the court shall designate the appropriate issues and
resolve them. If not, the court shall enter an order finding no unresolved issues material to the
legality of Applicant’s confinement and notify the District Clerk so the writ record may be returned
to this Court.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has reviewed the writ
application and resolved any fact issues, if necessary. Any issues shall be resolved within 90 days
of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the
transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with any findings
of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this
order. Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this
Court.
Filed: June 5, 2019 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chung, Jay Yoon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chung-jay-yoon-texcrimapp-2019.