Chulick v. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp.

13 A.D.2d 889, 215 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10964

This text of 13 A.D.2d 889 (Chulick v. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chulick v. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp., 13 A.D.2d 889, 215 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10964 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: In affirming the order, we do not pass upon the question of whether proof should be admitted upon the trial that the equipment on the car failed to comply with the standard set up by the Safety Appliance Act, as bearing upon the cause of action for common-law negligence. (Appeal from order of Brie Special Term granting motions by the two defendant railroad companies to strike out allegations in the complaint.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 A.D.2d 889, 215 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chulick-v-allied-chemical-dye-corp-nyappdiv-1961.