Chudyk v. 5th Ave. Coach Line, Inc.

6 A.D.2d 1003, 177 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4799
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 1958·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order denying motion for consolidation unanimously modified on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, so as to direct a joint trial of Action No. 20 with the 19 consolidated actions when the latter are reached for trial. Although the actions cannot be consolidated organically, they should be tried jointly. They all arise out of the same accident, require much the same proof, and would work no substantial prejudice to any of the parties (Civ. Prac. Act, § 96-a; Vidal v. Sheffield Farms Co., 208 Misc. 438). In view of the large number of parties who will be presenting medical proof, it may not be inappropriate for the trial court, in the exercise of its discretion, to direct a trial to determine the issue of liability alone before proceeding to try the issue of damages (Civ. Prac. Act, § 443). Settle Order. Concur— Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chudyk v. 5th Ave. Coach Line, Inc., 6 A.D.2d 1003, 177 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

6 A.D.2d 1003 (Chudyk v. 5th Ave. Coach Line, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bass v. France
70 A.D.2d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)