Chudnowsky v. Re-Mo Holding Corporation

85 N.E.2d 55, 298 N.Y. 904
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 3, 1949·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence presents an issue of fact-as to whether the agreement, by which the plaintiff purchased the apartment building in suit, was induced by fraudulent representations of the defendant. No opinion.

Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, DesmoNd, Dye and Fuld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chudnowsky v. Re-Mo Holding Corporation, 85 N.E.2d 55, 298 N.Y. 904 (N.Y. 1949).

85 N.E.2d 55 (Chudnowsky v. Re-Mo Holding Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mann v. Kreiss (In Re Kreiss)
72 B.R. 933 (E.D. New York, 1987)
Chudnowsky v. Re-Mo Holding Corp.
194 Misc. 1028 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)