Chuck Armstrong v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 10, 2019·No. 03-19-00319-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00319-CR

Chuck Armstrong, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 79648, THE HONORABLE FANCY H. JEZEK, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Chuck Armstrong seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for

possession of a controlled substance. See Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.115. The trial court

has certified that this is a plea-bargain case and appellant has no right of appeal. Accordingly,

the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: June 10, 2019

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chuck Armstrong v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Chuck Armstrong v. State (Chuck Armstrong v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 481.115
Texas HS § 481.115