Chuck Armstrong v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-19-00319-CR
Chuck Armstrong, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 79648, THE HONORABLE FANCY H. JEZEK, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Chuck Armstrong seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for
possession of a controlled substance. See Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.115. The trial court
has certified that this is a plea-bargain case and appellant has no right of appeal. Accordingly,
the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).
__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: June 10, 2019
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chuck Armstrong v. State (Chuck Armstrong v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.