Chubb v. Washington

293 U.S. 520, 55 S. Ct. 106
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 8, 1934·No. No. 288·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question. Kerr Glass Mfg. Corp. v. Superior Court, 286 U. S. 532; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina-Tennessee Power Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 134; Chapin v. Fye, 179 U. S. 127, 129, 130. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chubb v. Washington, 293 U.S. 520, 55 S. Ct. 106 (1934).

293 U.S. 520 (Chubb v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chapin v. Fye
179 U.S. 127 (Supreme Court, 1900)
Manhattan Life Ins. Co. of NY v. Cohen
234 U.S. 123 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Kerr Glass Mfg. Corp. v. Superior Court
286 U.S. 532 (Supreme Court, 1932)