Chubb v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Chubb v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.

689 N.E.2d 974, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1438, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 411

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 10, 1998

Docket96- 2511

StatusPublished

This text of 689 N.E.2d 974 (Chubb v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chubb v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp., 689 N.E.2d 974, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1438, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 411 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 96APE03-292. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. On February 3, 1998, appellant filed a document titled “Motion of appellant for leave to file notice of supplemental fact (with memorandum in support attached).” Whereas appellant’s document, in particular the attached memorandum in support, violates the prohibition of S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(8) against filing additional materials relating to the merits of the case after the case has been orally argued, unless the court by order has permitted the filing of additional materials,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s document be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 96APE03-292. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. On February 3, 1998, appellant filed a document titled “Motion of appellant for leave to file notice of supplemental fact (with memorandum in support attached).” Whereas appellant’s document, in particular the attached memorandum in support, violates the prohibition of S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(8) against filing additional materials relating to the merits of the case after the case has been orally argued, unless the court by order has permitted the filing of additional materials,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s document be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

689 N.E.2d 974, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1438, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chubb-v-ohio-bur-of-workers-comp-ohio-1998.