Chu v. Kramarsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chu v. Kramarsky

60 A.D.2d 601, 400 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14561

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 12, 1977·Published

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated June 20, 1977, which affirmed a determination and order of the State Division of Human Rights which, after a preliminary investigation, dismissed petitioner’s complaint charging an unlawful discriminatory practice relating to employment on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex and marital status. Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Upon the record presented we conclude that the complaint lacks merit as a matter of law (cf. State Div. of Human Rights v Buffalo Auto Glass Co., 42 AD2d 678). Hopkins, J. P., Rabin, Shapiro, and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated June 20, 1977, which affirmed a determination and order of the State Division of Human Rights which, after a preliminary investigation, dismissed petitioner’s complaint charging an unlawful discriminatory practice relating to employment on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex and marital status. Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Upon the record presented we conclude that the complaint lacks merit as a matter of law (cf. State Div. of Human Rights v Buffalo Auto Glass Co., 42 AD2d 678). Hopkins, J. P., Rabin, Shapiro, and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Chu v. Kramarsky, 60 A.D.2d 601, 400 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

60 A.D.2d 601 (Chu v. Kramarsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related