Chu v. Kramarsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chu v. Kramarsky

60 A.D.2d 601, 400 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14561

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.2d 601 (Chu v. Kramarsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chu v. Kramarsky, 60 A.D.2d 601, 400 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated June 20, 1977, which affirmed a determination and order of the State Division of Human Rights which, after a preliminary investigation, dismissed petitioner’s complaint charging an unlawful discriminatory practice relating to employment on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex and marital status. Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Upon the record presented we conclude that the complaint lacks merit as a matter of law (cf. State Div. of Human Rights v Buffalo Auto Glass Co., 42 AD2d 678). Hopkins, J. P., Rabin, Shapiro, and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated June 20, 1977, which affirmed a determination and order of the State Division of Human Rights which, after a preliminary investigation, dismissed petitioner’s complaint charging an unlawful discriminatory practice relating to employment on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex and marital status. Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Upon the record presented we conclude that the complaint lacks merit as a matter of law (cf. State Div. of Human Rights v Buffalo Auto Glass Co., 42 AD2d 678). Hopkins, J. P., Rabin, Shapiro, and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 601, 400 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chu-v-kramarsky-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack