Chrysler Motor Corp. v. Nail

317 So. 2d 147, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14158
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 1975·No. No. 75-575·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal of a summary final judgment entered in favor of appellee, Norman Nail, and against appellant, Chrysler Motor Corporation, on the issue of liability in an action seeking damages for fraud, misrepresentation and breach of warranty.

The pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions reveal that [148]*148there are geniiine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment; specifically, whether appellant through its regional service representative warranted or fraudulently represented to Appellee-Nail the new and unused condition of the Dodge Charger purchased by Appellee-Nail, and whether appellant was vicariously liable for warranties and fraudulent representations made by appellee, Jim Hooper Dodge, North, through its employees, concerning the new and unused condition of the Dodge Charger purchased by Appellee-Nail. Since fact issues exist, summary judgment was prematurely entered, and we therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed. Rule 1.510(c) Fla.RCP (1973); Leaks v. Adeimy, 195 So.2d 47 (Fla[App.1967).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

CROSS, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chrysler Motor Corp. v. Nail, 317 So. 2d 147, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14158 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

317 So. 2d 147 (Chrysler Motor Corp. v. Nail) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leaks v. Adeimy
195 So. 2d 47 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)