Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Passarelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Passarelli

56 A.D.2d 643, 391 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10764

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 643 (Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Passarelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Passarelli, 56 A.D.2d 643, 391 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion, plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 3, 1975, as (1) granted the motion of the defendants Hoffman for summary judgment and (2) denied its cross motion for summary judgment against all of the defendants. Order modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provision which granted the motion of defendants Hoffman and by substituting therefor a provision that the said motion is denied. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff payable by defendants Hoffman. Factual issues exist as to whether the three-year Statute of Limitations applies to the claim against the defendants Hoffman. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion, plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 3, 1975, as (1) granted the motion of the defendants Hoffman for summary judgment and (2) denied its cross motion for summary judgment against all of the defendants. Order modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provision which granted the motion of defendants Hoffman and by substituting therefor a provision that the said motion is denied. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff payable by defendants Hoffman. Factual issues exist as to whether the three-year Statute of Limitations applies to the claim against the defendants Hoffman. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 643, 391 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chrysler-credit-corp-v-passarelli-nyappdiv-1977.