Chrysler Corporation, Eight Mile Road Stamping Plant v. National Labor Relations Board

595 F.2d 364, 101 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2837, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 15564
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 9, 1979
Docket77-1136
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 595 F.2d 364 (Chrysler Corporation, Eight Mile Road Stamping Plant v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chrysler Corporation, Eight Mile Road Stamping Plant v. National Labor Relations Board, 595 F.2d 364, 101 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2837, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 15564 (6th Cir. 1979).

Opinion

ORDER

This proceeding is before us on the petition of Chrysler Corporation, Eight Mile Road Stamping Plant, to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board, dated January 19, 1977, reported at 227 NLRB No. 186, finding that Chrysler violated Section 8(a)(1) of the Act (29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.), by maintaining solicitation and distribution rules which were facially invalid, and on the cross-application of the Board for enforcement of its order.

We are of the opinion that Chrysler’s Guide to Good Conduct Rules 17 and 18, involved in this proceeding, are not invalid on their face and are not vague, ambiguous and confusing.

The order of the Board is not supported by substantial evidence; in fact, there is not an iota of evidence that any employee of Chrysler at its Eight Mile Road Stamping Plant was ever confused or misled by the Rules, but in fact there was evidence that the employees over a period of years were abiding by the Rules in connection with solicitation and distribution of literature at the Company’s plant.

There was also evidence that the Regional Director of the Board had approved the Rules.

It is therefore ORDERED that the petition for review be and it is hereby granted, and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement be and it is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
595 F.2d 364, 101 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2837, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 15564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chrysler-corporation-eight-mile-road-stamping-plant-v-national-labor-ca6-1979.