Chronister v. Sam Tanksley Trucking, Inc.

109 F.R.D. 1, 4 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1245, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11118
District Court, N.D. Illinois·Decided December 5, 1983·No. No. 83 C 332·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge.

Defendant’s motion to reconsider [569 F.Supp. 464] is granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(e) provides that service upon a party who is not an inhabitant or found within the state may be made under the circumstances and in the manner prescribed in a statute or court rule of the state in which the district court sits. According to Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 110 11 2-208 and U 2-209, parties outside the state may be personally served. Defendant must therefore be personally served, notwithstanding the provisions for service by mail contained in Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(2)(C)(ii). Plaintiff will be given 45 days in which to properly serve defendant. If service is not effected, her case will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Status set for Friday, December 9, 1983, is stricken; status hearing is set for Friday, February 10,1984, at 10:00 a.m. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chronister v. Sam Tanksley Trucking, Inc., 109 F.R.D. 1, 4 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1245, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11118 (N.D. Ill. 1983).

109 F.R.D. 1 (Chronister v. Sam Tanksley Trucking, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related