Chromy v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
This text of 437 F. App'x 558 (Chromy v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Karl D. Chromy appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action seeking review of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his objection to the appointment of Integrity Plus, RPP, as his representative payee responsible for oversight of his disability benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s decision on mootness. Sample v. Johnson, 771 F.2d 1335, 1338 (9th Cir.1985). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed this action because it was rendered moot when Integrity Plus resigned its appointment as Chromy’s payee. See id. (“A moot action is one where the issues are no longer live....”).
Chromy’s remaining contentions, including those concerning discovery and service of the motion to dismiss, are unavailing.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
437 F. App'x 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chromy-v-commissioner-of-the-social-security-administration-ca9-2011.