Christy v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Christy v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.

94 A. 833, 249 Pa. 245, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 712

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 19, 1915

DocketAppeal, No. 86

StatusPublished

This text of 94 A. 833 (Christy v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christy v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co., 94 A. 833, 249 Pa. 245, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 712 (Pa. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In this action of trespass to recover for damages done to property which appellant alleges in his statement of claim he owns, there was a verdict in his favor. Subsequently judgment was entered for the defendant non obstante veredicto, for the' reason that the plaintiff had failed to show title to the property upon which he alleges an additional servitude was imposed. This action of the court was proper, and its judgment is now affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

In this action of trespass to recover for damages done to property which appellant alleges in his statement of claim he owns, there was a verdict in his favor. Subsequently judgment was entered for the defendant non obstante veredicto, for the' reason that the plaintiff had failed to show title to the property upon which he alleges an additional servitude was imposed. This action of the court was proper, and its judgment is now affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 A. 833, 249 Pa. 245, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christy-v-philadelphia-reading-railway-co-pa-1915.