Christy v. PA Turnpike Comm
Opinion
Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
4-27-1995
Christy v PA Turnpike Comm Precedential or Non-Precedential:
Docket 94-1386
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995
Recommended Citation "Christy v PA Turnpike Comm" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 84. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/84
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
Nos. 94-1386 and 94-1398 ___________
CHARLES A. CHRISTY,
vs.
PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION, A DULY ORGANIZED AND EXISTING AGENCY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; ROBERT BRADY, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JAMES J. DODARO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; HOWARD YERUSALIM, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; FRANK S. URSOMARSO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JAMES F. MALONE, III, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JOHN L. SOKOL, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; S. MICHAEL PALERMO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JOSEPH L. DIRIENZO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; SAMUEL S. CARNABUCI, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; MELVIN M. SHELTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; DEBORAH KOVAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JOHN A. BOSCHI, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; VINCENT J. GRECO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JOHN A. STEWART, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; GEORGE PILECKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; SEAN PILECKI, INDIVIDUALLY
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Robert Brady, Vincent Greco and John Stewart
Appellants No. 94-1386
John A. Boschi,
Appellant No. 94-1398 ___________
BEFORE: STAPLETON, ALITO and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.
___________
ORDER ___________
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The petition for panel rehearing is granted.
2. The panel's opinion filed March 27, l995 is
vacated.
3. A revised panel opinion will be filed following
circulation to the full court in accordance with I.O.P. 9.4.
4. The application for rehearing in banc is dismissed
as moot, but without prejudice to the filing of a new application
for rehearing in banc in accordance with I.O.P. 9.5.
BY THE COURT
/s/ Timothy K. Lewis Circuit Judge
Dated: April 27, l995
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christy v. PA Turnpike Comm (Christy v. PA Turnpike Comm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.