Christy v. PA Turnpike Comm

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 27, 1995·No. 94-1386·Unknown

Opinion

Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

4-27-1995

Christy v PA Turnpike Comm Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 94-1386

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995

Recommended Citation "Christy v PA Turnpike Comm" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 84. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/84

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

Nos. 94-1386 and 94-1398 ___________

CHARLES A. CHRISTY,

vs.

PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION, A DULY ORGANIZED AND EXISTING AGENCY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; ROBERT BRADY, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JAMES J. DODARO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; HOWARD YERUSALIM, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; FRANK S. URSOMARSO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JAMES F. MALONE, III, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JOHN L. SOKOL, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; S. MICHAEL PALERMO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JOSEPH L. DIRIENZO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; SAMUEL S. CARNABUCI, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; MELVIN M. SHELTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; DEBORAH KOVAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JOHN A. BOSCHI, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; VINCENT J. GRECO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JOHN A. STEWART, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; GEORGE PILECKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; SEAN PILECKI, INDIVIDUALLY

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Robert Brady, Vincent Greco and John Stewart

Appellants No. 94-1386

John A. Boschi,

Appellant No. 94-1398 ___________

BEFORE: STAPLETON, ALITO and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

___________

ORDER ___________

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The petition for panel rehearing is granted.

2. The panel's opinion filed March 27, l995 is

vacated.

3. A revised panel opinion will be filed following

circulation to the full court in accordance with I.O.P. 9.4.

4. The application for rehearing in banc is dismissed

as moot, but without prejudice to the filing of a new application

for rehearing in banc in accordance with I.O.P. 9.5.

BY THE COURT

/s/ Timothy K. Lewis Circuit Judge

Dated: April 27, l995

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christy v. PA Turnpike Comm, (3d Cir. 1995).

Christy v. PA Turnpike Comm (Christy v. PA Turnpike Comm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.