Christy v. Hutchings

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedJanuary 27, 2021
Docket2:21-cv-00132
StatusUnknown

This text of Christy v. Hutchings (Christy v. Hutchings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christy v. Hutchings, (D. Nev. 2021).

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 DERRELL LEE CHRISTY, JR., Case No.: 2:21-cv-00132-APG-BNW

4 Petitioner, ORDER

5 v.

6 WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, et al.,

7 Respondents.

9 This action is a petition for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, by 10 Derrell Lee Christy, Jr., an individual incarcerated at Nevada’s Southern Desert Correctional 11 Center. Christy initiated this action on January 25, 2021, by filing a petition for writ of habeas 12 corpus (ECF No. 1), a Motion for Leave (ECF No. 2), and a Motion for Appointment of Counsel 13 (ECF No. 3). Christy paid the filing fee (ECF No. 1-1). 14 I have examined Christy’s petition, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 15 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and I determine that it merits service upon the 16 respondents. I will, therefore, order the petition served upon the respondents, and will direct the 17 respondents to appear, but will not require any further action on the part of the respondents at 18 this time. 19 In Christy’s Motion for Leave (ECF No. 2), he requests leave of court to file his petition 20 despite its length. Such a motion is unnecessary. Christy’s petition has been filed (ECF No. 1). I 21 will, therefore, deny this motion as moot. 22 State prisoners applying for habeas corpus relief are not entitled to appointed counsel 23 unless the circumstances indicate that appointed counsel is necessary to prevent due process 1 violations. Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986) (citing Kreiling v. Field, 431 2 F.2d 638, 640 (9th Cir. 1970) (per curiam). The court may, however, appoint counsel at any 3 stage of the proceedings if the interests of justice so require. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also 4 Rule 8(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196. Christy’s petition may

5 raise relatively complex issues, and it appears that he will not be able to adequately litigate this 6 action without counsel. I therefore find that appointment of counsel is in the interests of justice. 7 I THEREFORE ORDER that Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 8 3) is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) is appointed to 9 represent Petitioner. If the FPD is unable to represent Petitioner, because of a conflict of interest 10 or for any other reason, alternate counsel will be appointed. In either case, counsel will represent 11 Petitioner in all federal court proceedings relating to this matter, unless allowed to withdraw. 12 I FURTHER ORDER that the Clerk of the Court is directed to electronically serve upon 13 the FPD a copy of this order, together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF 14 No. 1).

15 I FURTHER ORDER that the FPD will have 30 days from the date of this order to file a 16 notice of appearance, or to indicate to the Court its inability to represent the petitioner in this 17 case. 18 I FURTHER ORDER that the Clerk of the Court is directed to add Aaron Ford, Attorney 19 General of the State of Nevada, as counsel for Respondents and to provide Respondents an 20 electronic copy of all items previously filed in this case by regenerating the Notice of Electronic 21 Filing to the office of the AG only. 22 23 1 I FURTHER ORDER that Respondents will have 30 days from the date of this order to 2|| appear in this action. Respondents will not be required to respond to the habeas petition at this 3]| time. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Leave (ECF No. 2) is DENIED as moot. 6 7 DATED: January 27, 2021 8 _¢ Loe ANDREW P. GORDON 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christy v. Hutchings, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christy-v-hutchings-nvd-2021.