Christy v. City of Alhambra
62 P.2d 757, 17 Cal. App. 2d 626, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 628
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Christy v. City of Alhambra. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 Cal. App. 2d 499 →
Opinion
This case is before us on an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. The clerk’s transcript was filed August 26, 1936. Thereafter the cause was regularly ordered on calendar for November 20, 1936, and due notice given, and service on the order to show cause has been duly made. The appellant has made no appearance in the case. No briefs have been filed. No extensions of time have been requested. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christy v. City of Alhambra, 62 P.2d 757, 17 Cal. App. 2d 626, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 628 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936).
62 P.2d 757 (Christy v. City of Alhambra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.