Christy v. Board of Pensions & Retirement of Philadelphia
This text of 611 A.2d 198 (Christy v. Board of Pensions & Retirement of Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
The appellant, Carmen Christy, was denied his pension benefits under the Municipal Retirement System Ordinance of the City of Philadelphia on the basis of alleged criminal misconduct, without ever having been formally charged or convicted. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed today in Mazzo v. Board of Pensions and Retirement of the City of Philadelphia, 531 Pa. 78, 611 A.2d 193 (1992), the denial of benefits was improper. The order of the Commonwealth Court is, accordingly, reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
611 A.2d 198, 531 Pa. 88, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christy-v-board-of-pensions-retirement-of-philadelphia-pa-1992.