Christy Michelle Berry v. Lester Stephen Berry - Concurring
This text of Christy Michelle Berry v. Lester Stephen Berry - Concurring (Christy Michelle Berry v. Lester Stephen Berry - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
CHRISTY MICHELLE BERRY v. LESTER STEPHEN BERRY
Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 148677-2 Daryl R. Fansler, Chancellor
No. E2004-01832-COA-R3-CV - FILED MAY 31, 2005
CHARLES D. SUSANO , JR., concurring.
I concur in the majority’s opinion. I write separately to stress that which is missing in this case, i.e., evidence, be it in the form of expert testimony or otherwise, showing that the subject child has been, or can reasonably be expected to be, adversely affected by his mother’s lifestyle. In my opinion, the trial court’s judgment must be reversed because of a lack of proof to support its critical finding of adverse effect.
_______________________________ CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christy Michelle Berry v. Lester Stephen Berry - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christy-michelle-berry-v-lester-stephen-berry-conc-tennctapp-2005.