Christy Michelle Berry v. Lester Stephen Berry - Concurring

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedMay 31, 2005
DocketE2004-01832-COA-R3-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Christy Michelle Berry v. Lester Stephen Berry - Concurring (Christy Michelle Berry v. Lester Stephen Berry - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christy Michelle Berry v. Lester Stephen Berry - Concurring, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

CHRISTY MICHELLE BERRY v. LESTER STEPHEN BERRY

Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 148677-2 Daryl R. Fansler, Chancellor

No. E2004-01832-COA-R3-CV - FILED MAY 31, 2005

CHARLES D. SUSANO , JR., concurring.

I concur in the majority’s opinion. I write separately to stress that which is missing in this case, i.e., evidence, be it in the form of expert testimony or otherwise, showing that the subject child has been, or can reasonably be expected to be, adversely affected by his mother’s lifestyle. In my opinion, the trial court’s judgment must be reversed because of a lack of proof to support its critical finding of adverse effect.

_______________________________ CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christy Michelle Berry v. Lester Stephen Berry - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christy-michelle-berry-v-lester-stephen-berry-conc-tennctapp-2005.