Christy, Inc. v. Black & Decker (u.S.), Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedSeptember 7, 2017
Docket16-2499
StatusUnpublished

This text of Christy, Inc. v. Black & Decker (u.S.), Inc. (Christy, Inc. v. Black & Decker (u.S.), Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christy, Inc. v. Black & Decker (u.S.), Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2017).

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CHRISTY, INC., Appellant

v.

BLACK & DECKER (U.S.), INC., STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC., Appellees ______________________

2016-2499 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015- 00472. ______________________

Before DYK, MOORE, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER Upon consideration of the above-captioned appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1) Appeal 2016-2499 is dismissed as moot. 2) No costs. 2 CHRISTY, INC. v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.), INC.

FOR THE COURT

September 7, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christy, Inc. v. Black & Decker (u.S.), Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christy-inc-v-black-decker-us-inc-cafc-2017.