Christy Allane Rodriguez v. State
Opinion
Order entered September 8, 2015
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00687-CR
CHRISTY ALLANE RODRIGUEZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 064768
ORDER Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in support. After reviewing
the brief, we conclude it does not satisfy the requirements of Anders v. California and its
progeny. Specifically, the brief states, and the record shows, that appellant had a jury trial as to
both guilt/innocence and punishment. The record also shows that appellant filed several pretrial
motions, including motion to suppress evidence. The brief does not address the trial court’s
rulings on the pretrial motions, voir dire, the trial court’s evidentiary rulings, the jury charges and
any objections to them, the sentence imposed, or the sufficiency of trial counsel. Accordingly,
the brief does not comply with requirements of Anders and we STRIKE the brief. We ORDER counsel to file, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, either an
Anders brief that adequately addresses all of the issues identified above or a brief raising issues
on the merits.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to counsel for all parties.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christy Allane Rodriguez v. State (Christy Allane Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.