Christopulos v. Christopulos

2022 NY Slip Op 05018
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Christopulos v. Christopulos. Read the opinion of the Court — 2022 NY Slip Op 04712
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 24, 2022·No. Index No. 705015/14·Published

Opinion

Christopulos v Christopulos (2022 NY Slip Op 05018)
Christopulos v Christopulos
2022 NY Slip Op 05018
Decided on August 24, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on August 24, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
SHERI S. ROMAN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.

2021-06093
(Index No. 705015/14)

[*1]Gregory Christopulos, respondent,

v

Katherine Christopulos, etc., et al., defendants, Nicholas Spyreas, appellant.


Nicholas Spyreas, Greenwich, Connecticut, appellant pro se.

The Dweck Law Firm, LLP, New York, NY (Jack S. Dweck and Christopher S. Fraser of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, for an accounting and to cancel a notice of mechanic's lien, the defendant Nicholas Spyreas appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Frederick D.R. Sampson, J.), entered September 30, 2019. The order granted the plaintiff's motion to discharge a mechanic's lien.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant's failure to file proof of service of the notice of mechanic's lien within 35 days of the filing of the notice of lien on April 2, 2019, as required by Lien Law § 11, automatically terminated the notice as a lien, and as such, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's motion to discharge the mechanic's lien (see Matter of Heavy Constr. Co., Inc. v Metro Constr. Equities, Inc., 130 AD3d 622; Outrigger Constr. Co. v Nostrand Ave. Dev. Corp., 217 AD2d 689, 690; Matter of Podolsky v Narnoc Corp., 196 AD2d 593, 594-595; 146 W. 45th St. Corp. v McNally, 188 AD2d 410).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

DILLON, J.P., CONNOLLY, ROMAN and MALTESE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christopulos v. Christopulos, 2022 NY Slip Op 05018 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

2022 NY Slip Op 05018 (Christopulos v. Christopulos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Heavy Constr. Co., Inc. v. Metro Constr. Equities, Inc.
130 A.D.3d 622 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
146 West 45th Street Corp. v. McNally
188 A.D.2d 410 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Podolsky v. Narnoc Corp.
196 A.D.2d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Outrigger Construction Co. v. Nostrand Avenue Development Corp.
217 A.D.2d 689 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)