Christopoulos v. Socall

Michigan Supreme Court

Christopoulos v. Socall

759 N.W.2d 390

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 27, 2009

Docket136822

StatusPublished

This text of 759 N.W.2d 390 (Christopoulos v. Socall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christopoulos v. Socall, 759 N.W.2d 390 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

759 N.W.2d 390 (2009)

Elliot CHRISTOPOULOS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Allan Dean SOCALL, Defendant-Appellee, and
Katherine Socall, Defendant.

Docket No. 136822. COA No. 277611.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 27, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 29, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

759 N.W.2d 390 (2009)

Elliot CHRISTOPOULOS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Allan Dean SOCALL, Defendant-Appellee, and
Katherine Socall, Defendant.

Docket No. 136822. COA No. 277611.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 27, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 29, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

759 N.W.2d 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopoulos-v-socall-mich-2009.

Opinion

Elliot CHRISTOPOULOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Allan Dean SOCALL, Defendant-Appellee, and Katherine Socall, Defendant.

Order

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Elliot CHRISTOPOULOS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Allan Dean SOCALL, Defendant-Appellee, and
Katherine Socall, Defendant.