Christopoulos v. Liakas
This text of 285 A.D. 884 (Christopoulos v. Liakas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While appellant’s proof was insufficient to establish his title to the property, a should have been directed pursuant to section 924 of the Civil Practice Act, since there was a sufficient showing of facts by the plaintiff to require a trial on the question of title. Appellant, if he so chooses, may assert his claim of title by intervening in the action instituted by the plaintiff and the Sheriff against the bank. Order modified to the extent of providing for a hearing on the question of title and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Settle order. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Bastow and Rabin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 A.D. 884, 137 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopoulos-v-liakas-nyappdiv-1955.