Christopolous v. Southern Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Christopolous v. Southern Surety Co.

123 So. 819, 98 Fla. 426

DecidedSeptember 17, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 123 So. 819 (Christopolous v. Southern Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christopolous v. Southern Surety Co., 123 So. 819, 98 Fla. 426 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been' submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its •judgment to “be' given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is.no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree' of the circuit court be; and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

'Whiteield, P. J., and, Strum and Bueord, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been' submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its •judgment to “be' given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is.no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree' of the circuit court be; and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

'Whiteield, P. J., and, Strum and Bueord, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 So. 819, 98 Fla. 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopolous-v-southern-surety-co-fla-1929.