Christopolous v. Southern Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Christopolous v. Southern Surety Co.

123 So. 819, 98 Fla. 426

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 17, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been' submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its •judgment to “be' given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is.no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree' of the circuit court be; and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

'Whiteield, P. J., and, Strum and Bueord, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been' submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its •judgment to “be' given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is.no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree' of the circuit court be; and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

'Whiteield, P. J., and, Strum and Bueord, J. J., concur.

Christopolous v. Southern Surety Co., 123 So. 819, 98 Fla. 426 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

123 So. 819 (Christopolous v. Southern Surety Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.