Christopher v. State
This text of 135 So. 419 (Christopher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws (Code 1923, § 4621) by having whisky in his possession, and fined $50.
We have carefully examined every exception reserved. If there is shown by any one of same an erroneous ruling, which we do not assert, said ruling was in our opinion fully cured by the testimony of appellant himself. By his own testimony he was guilty as charged.
We find nowhere prejudicial error, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 So. 419, 24 Ala. App. 335, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-v-state-alactapp-1931.