Christopher v. St. Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Christopher v. St. Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc.

631 F. App'x 138

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2016·No. No. 15-1769·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Cleo Anthanett Christopher appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. [139]*139Christopher v. St. Vincent De Paul of Baltimore, Inc., No. l:14-ev-03184-RDB, 2015 WL 3745025 (D. Md. filed June 11, 2015 & entered June 12, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Cleo Anthanett Christopher appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. [139]*139Christopher v. St. Vincent De Paul of Baltimore, Inc., No. l:14-ev-03184-RDB, 2015 WL 3745025 (D. Md. filed June 11, 2015 & entered June 12, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Christopher v. St. Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc., 631 F. App'x 138 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

631 F. App'x 138 (Christopher v. St. Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related