Christopher v. St. Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc.
This text of 631 F. App'x 138 (Christopher v. St. Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cleo Anthanett Christopher appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. [139]*139Christopher v. St. Vincent De Paul of Baltimore, Inc., No. l:14-ev-03184-RDB, 2015 WL 3745025 (D. Md. filed June 11, 2015 & entered June 12, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
631 F. App'x 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-v-st-vincent-de-paul-of-baltimore-inc-ca4-2016.