Christopher v. St. Vincent de Paul of Baltimore Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Christopher v. St. Vincent de Paul of Baltimore Inc.

537 F. App'x 137

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2013·No. No. 13-1281·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Cleo Anthanett Christopher appeals the district court’s order dismissing her disability discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims. We have reviewed the [138] record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Christopher v. St. Vincent DePaul of Baltimore, Inc., No. 1:12-cv-02309-CCB (D.Md. Feb. 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Cleo Anthanett Christopher appeals the district court’s order dismissing her disability discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims. We have reviewed the [138] record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Christopher v. St. Vincent DePaul of Baltimore, Inc., No. 1:12-cv-02309-CCB (D.Md. Feb. 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Christopher v. St. Vincent de Paul of Baltimore Inc., 537 F. App'x 137 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

537 F. App'x 137 (Christopher v. St. Vincent de Paul of Baltimore Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.