Christopher v. St. Vincent de Paul of Baltimore Inc.
This text of 537 F. App'x 137 (Christopher v. St. Vincent de Paul of Baltimore Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cleo Anthanett Christopher appeals the district court’s order dismissing her disability discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims. We have reviewed the [138]*138record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Christopher v. St. Vincent DePaul of Baltimore, Inc., No. 1:12-cv-02309-CCB (D.Md. Feb. 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
537 F. App'x 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-v-st-vincent-de-paul-of-baltimore-inc-ca4-2013.