Christopher v. Mungen
242 U.S. 611, 37 S. Ct. 18, 61 L. Ed. 526, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1405
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470; Mellon v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469. Mr. George C. Bedell for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Nathan P. Bryan and Mr. J. T. G. Crawford for the defendants in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christopher v. Mungen, 242 U.S. 611, 37 S. Ct. 18, 61 L. Ed. 526, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1405 (1916).
242 U.S. 611 (Christopher v. Mungen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon
223 U.S. 468 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
226 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Parker v. McLain
237 U.S. 469 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Mellon Co. v. McCafferty
239 U.S. 134 (Supreme Court, 1915)