Christopher v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
166 A.D.2d 334, 562 N.Y.S.2d 929, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13689
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 23, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Reargument of this court’s order (161 AD2d 274) entered on May 8, 1990 denied. Were we to reconsider defendant’s contention on the merits that the verdict is excessive, we would not conclude that the jury award to plaintiff in the sum of $275,000 "deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation” under CPLR 5501 (c). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christopher v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 166 A.D.2d 334, 562 N.Y.S.2d 929, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
166 A.D.2d 334 (Christopher v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thoda v. Arcoleo
179 A.D.2d 508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)