Christopher v. Christopher

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Christopher v. Christopher

145 So. 3d 88, 2013 WL 6361270, 2013 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 260

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedDecember 6, 2013

Docket2111039

StatusPublished

This text of 145 So. 3d 88 (Christopher v. Christopher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christopher v. Christopher, 145 So. 3d 88, 2013 WL 6361270, 2013 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 260 (Ala. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

MOORE, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed, and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte Christopher, 145 So.3d 60 (Ala.2013). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we hereby reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings, including the entry of an order allowing Carolyn Sue Christopher to “recover from [Charles] Phillip [Christopher] postminority-support payments she has made under the trial court’s order of January 18, 2012.” 145 So.3d at 72.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN, THOMAS, and DONALDSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

MOORE, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed, and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte Christopher, 145 So.3d 60 (Ala.2013). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we hereby reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings, including the entry of an order allowing Carolyn Sue Christopher to “recover from [Charles] Phillip [Christopher] postminority-support payments she has made under the trial court’s order of January 18, 2012.” 145 So.3d at 72.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN, THOMAS, and DONALDSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 So. 3d 88, 2013 WL 6361270, 2013 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-v-christopher-alacivapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack