Christopher Teggatz And Tanya Teggatz Vs. Sattler Homes, Inc.

CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedFebruary 1, 2008
Docket24 / 07-0414
StatusPublished

This text of Christopher Teggatz And Tanya Teggatz Vs. Sattler Homes, Inc. (Christopher Teggatz And Tanya Teggatz Vs. Sattler Homes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Teggatz And Tanya Teggatz Vs. Sattler Homes, Inc., (iowa 2008).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

No. 24 / 07-0414

Filed February 1, 2008

CHRISTOPHER TEGGATZ and TANYA TEGGATZ,

Appellants,

vs.

SATTLER HOMES, INC.,

Appellee.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Patrick R.

Grady, Judge.

Third-party purchasers of home appeal from summary judgment

for builder in suit for breach of implied warranty of workmanlike

construction. DECISION OF DISTRICT COURT REVERSED AND CASE

REMANDED.

Webb L. Wassmer of Simmons, Perrine PLC, Cedar Rapids, for

appellants.

James P. Craig and Mark J. Parmenter of Lederer, Weston, Craig,

PLC, Cedar Rapids, for appellee. 2

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Christopher and Tanya Teggatz, appeal a district court

order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Sattler

Homes, Inc., on the plaintiffs’ third-party-purchaser action for breach of

implied warranty of workmanlike construction against the homebuilder.

The district court granted Sattler Homes’ motion for summary judgment,

finding Iowa law does not extend the implied warranty of workmanlike

construction to a subsequent home purchaser. Today, we vacated a

court of appeals decision and reversed the judgment of the district court

in an action based upon an identical claim. See Speight v. Walters Dev.

Co., ___ N.W.2d ___ (Iowa 2008) (filed today). We held in Speight that

“subsequent purchasers may recover for breach of implied warranty of

workmanlike construction against a builder-vendor as recognized in Kirk

[v. Ridgway, 373 N.W.2d 491 (Iowa 1985)] for first-party purchasers.” Id.

at ___. Our ruling in Speight controls here. We therefore reverse the

district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendant

homebuilder and remand for further proceedings.

DECISION OF DISTRICT COURT REVERSED AND CASE

This opinion shall not be published.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kirk v. Ridgway
373 N.W.2d 491 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christopher Teggatz And Tanya Teggatz Vs. Sattler Homes, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-teggatz-and-tanya-teggatz-vs-sattler-homes-inc-iowa-2008.