Christopher Stafford Peaden v. the State of Texas
This text of Christopher Stafford Peaden v. the State of Texas (Christopher Stafford Peaden v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00045-CR
CHRISTOPHER STAFFORD PEADEN, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 100th District Court Carson County, Texas Trial Court No. 7345, Honorable Dale A. Rabe, Presiding
April 17, 2024 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Christopher Stafford Peaden, appeals his conviction for possession of
a controlled substance with intent to deliver1 and sentence to fifty years of confinement.
The appellate record was originally due March 11, 2024, but the reporter’s record has not
yet been filed. By letter of March 21, 2024, we notified the reporter that the record was
overdue and directed her to advise this Court of the status of the record by April 1.
1 See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY ANN. § 481.112. However, the reporter has not filed the record or had any further communication with this
Court to date.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and appellate courts are jointly
responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.”); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring
appellate courts to “make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and to
preserve the parties’ rights” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand,
the trial court shall determine the following:
(1) what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;
(2) why the reporter has not completed the necessary tasks;
(3) what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those
tasks; and
(4) whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial court
finds reasonable.
Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than thirty days
to complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter
to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by May 17,
2024.
2 Should the reporter file the record on or before May 1, 2024, she is directed to
immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not
be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher Stafford Peaden v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-stafford-peaden-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.