Christopher Ryan Wall v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 2, 2017
Docket05-16-01306-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Christopher Ryan Wall v. State (Christopher Ryan Wall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Ryan Wall v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order entered August 2, 2017

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01306-CR

CHRISTOPHER RYAN WALL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-81132-2015

ORDER Appellant’s brief was initially due April 26, 2017. When it was not filed, we notified

appellant by postcard dated April 27 and instructed him to file his brief along with a motion to

extend time. On May 10, appellant filed a motion to extend time to file his brief which we

granted. On June 12, he filed a second motion which we granted although we cautioned

appellant that the failure to file a brief by July 13 would result in this appeal being abated for a

hearing under rule 38.8(b). TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). To date, no brief has been filed and we have

had no communication from appellant.

Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this

order.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to send copies of this order to the Honorable Benjamin Smith,

Presiding Judge, 380th Judicial District Court; William Pigg; and the Collin County District

Attorney’s Office.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christopher Ryan Wall v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-ryan-wall-v-state-texapp-2017.